RegCheck searches the Engineering Council Register, which records the individuals entitled to use the professional titles CEng, IEng, EngTech and ICTTech. Those titles are protected under the council’s Royal Charter; engineering practice itself is not reserved by law, so registration is not a licence to work as an engineer.
Domain Rating ist eine datierte Ahrefs-Momentaufnahme der Domain-Autorität. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, geschätzter traffic and verweisende domains, so they are not published for any record.
Partly open The RegCheck page was served anonymously with no credential, so login is recorded as not required. No query was executed, so result content and any limits were not observed and stay null. The council states that a search requires an exact match, which is a documented behaviour rather than one observed here.
Einschätzung
Stärken
It is the register held by the body responsible for the UK engineering profession, rather than any one institution’s membership list.
The titles it records are protected under the council’s Royal Charter, so a confirmed entry has a definite meaning.
It includes people who registered in the past or hold inactive registrations, so a historical check is possible as well as a current one.
Einschränkungen
It protects titles, not an activity, and the protection comes from a Royal Charter rather than from statute. Registration is not required to work as an engineer.
Search requires an exact match to the record held, so the council itself warns that an unexpected nil result does not establish that someone is unregistered.
Assessment is carried out by licensed professional engineering institutions rather than by the council directly, so an entry reflects an institution’s assessment as much as a central decision.
It registers individual practitioners, not employers. An engineering business is not registered here, so the register does not establish anything about the company an engineer works for.
No search was executed during verification, so result content, coverage and any rate limit were not observed and none is asserted.
Hinweise zur Einreichung
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Schwierigkeit der Einreichung
Unbekannt
Typische Eintragsqualität
Hoch
Typische Freigabedauer
Unbekannt
Review process
Unbekannt
Am besten für
Checking whether an individual currently holds a UK engineering professional title such as CEng, IEng or EngTech.
Verifying a title claim where the exact registered name is known.
Nicht empfohlen für
Establishing that someone may lawfully work as an engineer. Engineering practice is not generally reserved by law in the United Kingdom, and registration is not a licence to practise.
Concluding from a nil result that a person is unregistered. The council states that a search requires an exact match, so an unexpected result does not mean the person is not registered.
Vorbereitungs-Checkliste
No checklist recorded yet.
Häufige Fehler
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
Was dieses Verzeichnis akzeptiert
Startups
Unbekannt
SaaS products
Unbekannt
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unbekannt
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Unbekannt
Developer tools
Unbekannt
Open-source projects
Unbekannt
Non-profits
Unbekannt
AI products
Unbekannt
Mobile apps
Unbekannt
Ecommerce stores
Unbekannt
Empfohlene Branchen
Engineers holding UK professional titles
Wie der PetroHrys Score zustande kam
Editorial trust 15%
9 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
7 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
7 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
7 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
8 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
5 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
8 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.