Evidence skutečných majitelů is the Czech register of beneficial owners, kept under Act No. 37/2021 Coll. and administered by the Ministry of Justice. On 17 December 2025 the Ministry withdrew public access to it, and inspection is now limited to registering persons, public authorities, obliged entities under the anti-money-laundering act and other legally entitled applicants.
Domain Rating ist eine datierte Ahrefs-Momentaufnahme der Domain-Autorität. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, geschätzter traffic and verweisende domains, so they are not published for any record.
Restricted Public access was withdrawn on 17 December 2025. The page that previously carried the public search now serves the withdrawal notice instead of a search form, so freeToSearch records the absence of any public search rather than a fee. Access requires authentication — a data box for a registering person’s own extract, or the state identity space or an approved application for remote access — which is why login and identity verification are both recorded as required. No form was reached, so the presence of a CAPTCHA is not asserted.
Official name
Evidence skutečných majitelů
English title
Redaktionelle Übersetzung
Einschätzung
Stärken
It is the statutory Czech beneficial ownership register, so an extract from it is the authoritative record of who ultimately owns or controls a registered entity.
The withdrawal of public access, the categories that retain access and the effect on existing remote-access permissions are all stated plainly on the register’s own front page rather than left to be inferred.
Remote access permissions granted before the withdrawal remain valid, and the Ministry opened an automated application route for obliged entities at the same time.
Einschränkungen
It is no longer open to the public. A member of the public cannot look up any entity’s beneficial owners here.
Every remaining route requires authentication — a data box, the state identity space, or an approved application — so the register cannot be checked anonymously at all.
An entry records who is registered as a beneficial owner. It is not a statement that the registration is complete, current or correct.
Hinweise zur Einreichung
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Schwierigkeit der Einreichung
Unbekannt
Typische Eintragsqualität
Hoch
Typische Freigabedauer
Unbekannt
Review process
Unbekannt
Am besten für
Understanding what the Czech beneficial ownership register holds and on what legal basis, before requesting access through one of the routes that remain open.
Obtaining a legal entity’s own beneficial ownership extract, which the entity can still retrieve by authenticating with its data box.
Nicht empfohlen für
Public beneficial ownership research. There is no public search at any price since 17 December 2025.
Checking company registration or filed documents, which sit in the public register on a separate system.
Vorbereitungs-Checkliste
No checklist recorded yet.
Häufige Fehler
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
Was dieses Verzeichnis akzeptiert
Startups
Yes
SaaS products
Unbekannt
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unbekannt
Freelancers
Unbekannt
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unbekannt
Open-source projects
Unbekannt
Non-profits
Yes
AI products
Unbekannt
Mobile apps
Unbekannt
Ecommerce stores
Unbekannt
Empfohlene Branchen
Czech legal entities subject to beneficial ownership registration
Wie der PetroHrys Score zustande kam
Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
5 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
4 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
5 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.