ProvenExpert

A customer-review and rating platform operated by Expert Systems AG in Berlin, strongest in the German-speaking market and available internationally in English since 2017. A free tier exists with a capped number of displayed reviews, and the paid tiers are priced openly.

Visit ProvenExpert (opens in a new tab)provenexpert.com

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
59
Domain Rating
91Ahrefs snapshot, measured

Domain Rating es una instantánea fechada de Ahrefs sobre la autoridad del dominio. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, tráfico estimado and dominios de referencia, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Verificación

Estado de verificación
Verificado
Fuente de verificación
Documentación oficial
Última verificación
Próxima verificación prevista
Revisor editorial
Petro Hrys

Registro

Acción de registro
Crear un registro

Información del registro

Scope
Global

Valoración

Puntos fuertes

  • The operator is named fully on its own company page: “ProvenExpert.com is an online service provided by Expert Systems AG”, with the footer confirming “© 2011 - 2026 Expert Systems AG”.
  • A genuinely free tier exists and is presented alongside the paid ones rather than hidden, so the entry point is knowable before signing up.
  • Paid tiers are priced openly — the Basic plan is listed at $359.88 per year — instead of being quoted only on request.
  • Reviews are collected through the platform’s own surveys as well as aggregated, and the operator publishes what each tier includes feature by feature.
  • The company page states where the business is run from and who leads it, which is more disclosure than most review platforms offer.

Limitaciones

  • The free tier is capped. The operator lists a limited number of displayed reviews and a single active survey per month, so a free profile is a sample of the product rather than a full one.
  • A thirty-day premium trial is offered at signup. A trial is not a free tier, and the two must not be confused when judging cost.
  • “ProvenExpert Profile indexed in Google” appears among the marketed features. That is the operator’s product description and is NOT adopted here — no indexing outcome is asserted.
  • An account is required before a profile exists, so this is not an anonymous submission.
  • Creating a profile is documented; claiming an existing third-party profile is not, so no claim flow is asserted.
  • Whether a business can respond to reviews is not documented on the pages consulted and is not asserted. A review system existing never implies a reply function.
  • Whether verification is required, and by what method, is not documented, so nothing about verification is asserted.
  • No Domain Rating is published for this platform. No valid measurement exists in the frozen historical set and none may be estimated, so the metric is recorded as not measured rather than guessed.
  • A listing is a directory entry. It is not evidence that a business is solvent, currently trading, licensed, or checked beyond what the operator documents here.
  • No ranking, indexing, traffic or lead outcome is asserted. The operator markets outcomes; this record does not adopt them.

Indicaciones para el envío

Official submission page (opens in a new tab)

Dificultad del envío
Fácil
Calidad habitual del registro
Desconocido
Tiempo habitual de aprobación
Desconocido
Review process
Desconocido

Ideal para

No recomendado para

Lista de preparación

No checklist recorded yet.

Errores frecuentes

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

Qué acepta este directorio

Startups
Desconocido
SaaS products
Yes
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Yes
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Desconocido
Open-source projects
Desconocido
Non-profits
Desconocido
AI products
Desconocido
Mobile apps
Desconocido
Ecommerce stores
Desconocido

Sectores recomendados

Cómo se llegó a la puntuación PetroHrys

Editorial trust 15%
6 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
6 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
4 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
6 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
5 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
6 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
7 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
7 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
8 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
5 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

Similar directories

Guías que cubren este directorio

Todavía no hay ninguna guía que cubra este directorio.

Dónde se sitúa