A business networking platform operated by Alignable Corporation, whose member profiles are published in public city directories. It is a peer-to-peer network first and a directory second — profiles are person-led — and the operator publishes no pricing, so the cost of membership is recorded as unestablished.
Domain Rating ist eine datierte Ahrefs-Momentaufnahme der Domain-Autorität. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, geschätzter traffic and verweisende domains, so they are not published for any record.
The operator is fully identified in its own terms as “ALIGNABLE CORPORATION, PO BOX 1666, NORTH FALMOUTH MA 02556”.
Profiles genuinely are public: a city directory such as the Boston page renders member businesses, with counts and descriptions, to a reader who is not signed in.
The platform is candid that it is a network rather than a listings product — its own profile describes it as “the networking platform for businesses”.
Coverage is stated by the operator as continental: “businesses across North America use Alignable”.
A business owner creates a profile directly by registering — the operator’s route is a single “Join Today” signup that leads into its own onboarding, with no waiting list or invitation step.
Einschränkungen
The cost is NOT established and is recorded as unknown. There is no pricing page, joining is presented only as “Join Today”, and the premium tier offers only “Try for Free” — a trial, which is not evidence that anything is free thereafter.
This is a networking platform, not a consumer directory. Its own mission statement is about business owners who “connect, build relationships”, so a profile here reaches peers rather than customers searching for a service.
Directory entries are person-led: public listings are headed by an individual’s name with the business as a secondary label, which is a different object from a business profile.
No review or rating system is documented anywhere on the pages consulted, so neither reviews nor owner responses are asserted. Absence here means unrecorded, not unavailable.
An account is required before a profile exists, so this is not an anonymous submission, and the membership figure quoted on the site is the operator’s own claim.
Whether verification is required, and by what method, is not documented, so nothing about verification is asserted.
A listing is a directory entry. It is not evidence that a business is solvent, currently trading, licensed, or checked beyond what the operator documents here.
No ranking, indexing, traffic or lead outcome is asserted. The operator markets outcomes; this record does not adopt them.
US small business owners who want peer referrals and local business networking rather than consumer discovery.
Businesses that want a publicly readable profile in a city-level directory without a consumer review system attached.
Nicht empfohlen für
Businesses that need to know the cost before joining. The operator publishes no pricing page.
Businesses seeking consumer reviews or ratings. This platform documents neither.
Anyone wanting a business-led rather than person-led profile. Entries are presented under an individual’s name.
Vorbereitungs-Checkliste
No checklist recorded yet.
Häufige Fehler
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
Was dieses Verzeichnis akzeptiert
Startups
Unbekannt
SaaS products
Unbekannt
Enterprises
Unbekannt
Agencies
Yes
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unbekannt
Open-source projects
Unbekannt
Non-profits
Unbekannt
AI products
Unbekannt
Mobile apps
Unbekannt
Ecommerce stores
Unbekannt
Empfohlene Branchen
professional-services
local-services
marketing
Wie der PetroHrys Score zustande kam
Editorial trust 15%
5 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
5 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
3 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
6 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
4 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
5 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
6 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
4 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
4 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.