A business networking platform operated by Alignable Corporation, whose member profiles are published in public city directories. It is a peer-to-peer network first and a directory second — profiles are person-led — and the operator publishes no pricing, so the cost of membership is recorded as unestablished.
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
The operator is fully identified in its own terms as “ALIGNABLE CORPORATION, PO BOX 1666, NORTH FALMOUTH MA 02556”.
Profiles genuinely are public: a city directory such as the Boston page renders member businesses, with counts and descriptions, to a reader who is not signed in.
The platform is candid that it is a network rather than a listings product — its own profile describes it as “the networking platform for businesses”.
Coverage is stated by the operator as continental: “businesses across North America use Alignable”.
A business owner creates a profile directly by registering — the operator’s route is a single “Join Today” signup that leads into its own onboarding, with no waiting list or invitation step.
Limitations
The cost is NOT established and is recorded as unknown. There is no pricing page, joining is presented only as “Join Today”, and the premium tier offers only “Try for Free” — a trial, which is not evidence that anything is free thereafter.
This is a networking platform, not a consumer directory. Its own mission statement is about business owners who “connect, build relationships”, so a profile here reaches peers rather than customers searching for a service.
Directory entries are person-led: public listings are headed by an individual’s name with the business as a secondary label, which is a different object from a business profile.
No review or rating system is documented anywhere on the pages consulted, so neither reviews nor owner responses are asserted. Absence here means unrecorded, not unavailable.
An account is required before a profile exists, so this is not an anonymous submission, and the membership figure quoted on the site is the operator’s own claim.
Whether verification is required, and by what method, is not documented, so nothing about verification is asserted.
A listing is a directory entry. It is not evidence that a business is solvent, currently trading, licensed, or checked beyond what the operator documents here.
No ranking, indexing, traffic or lead outcome is asserted. The operator markets outcomes; this record does not adopt them.
US small business owners who want peer referrals and local business networking rather than consumer discovery.
Businesses that want a publicly readable profile in a city-level directory without a consumer review system attached.
Not recommended for
Businesses that need to know the cost before joining. The operator publishes no pricing page.
Businesses seeking consumer reviews or ratings. This platform documents neither.
Anyone wanting a business-led rather than person-led profile. Entries are presented under an individual’s name.
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Unknown
Agencies
Yes
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
professional-services
local-services
marketing
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
5 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
5 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
3 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
6 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
4 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
5 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
6 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
4 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
4 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.