Krajowy Rejestr Sądowy is the Polish National Court Register, kept by the registry courts under the Act of 20 August 1997. It comprises the register of entrepreneurs — commercial companies, cooperatives, state enterprises and branches of foreign entrepreneurs — together with the register of associations, other social and professional organisations, foundations and public healthcare institutions.
Domain Rating es una instantánea fechada de Ahrefs sobre la autoridad del dominio. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, tráfico estimado and dominios de referencia, so they are not published for any record.
Company registerBusiness entity registerPublic filing database
Scope
National
Public access
Open The web search interface refused automated requests behind a bot-protection interstitial and its behaviour was not observed. Free anonymous access was instead confirmed against the ministry’s own open API at api-krs.ms.gov.pl, which returned a complete current extract for a test entity without any credential.
It is the constitutive register for Polish companies, cooperatives, associations and foundations, so an entry establishes legal existence rather than merely describing a business.
The Ministry of Justice publishes a free open API that returns a complete current extract for an entity without any account, which makes verification reproducible rather than screen-dependent.
One register covers both the commercial sector and the association and foundation sector, through two separate statutory sub-registers.
Financial documents filed by registered entities are held in the associated document repository, so filings can be reached from the register entry.
Limitaciones
It does not cover sole traders. A Polish natural person trading on their own account is registered in CEIDG, and neither register contains the other’s population.
The NIP and REGON numbers shown in a KRS extract originate in the tax register and in the REGON statistical register and are placed in KRS automatically; they are not established by the registry court.
The public web search sits behind bot protection that refused automated requests, so its interactive behaviour, any fee for certified output and any CAPTCHA could not be observed.
An entry records legal existence and filed data. It is not a statement about solvency, creditworthiness or the conduct of the entity.
Indicaciones para el envío
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Dificultad del envío
Desconocido
Calidad habitual del registro
Alta
Tiempo habitual de aprobación
Desconocido
Review process
Desconocido
Ideal para
Confirming that a Polish company, cooperative, association or foundation legally exists and reading its recorded officers and representation.
Obtaining a current extract for a Polish registered entity by its KRS number.
No recomendado para
Checking a Polish sole trader, who is not in this register at all but in CEIDG.
Treating an entry as evidence of solvency, creditworthiness or good standing, none of which the register records.
Lista de preparación
No checklist recorded yet.
Errores frecuentes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
Qué acepta este directorio
Startups
Yes
SaaS products
Desconocido
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Desconocido
Freelancers
Desconocido
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Desconocido
Open-source projects
Desconocido
Non-profits
Yes
AI products
Desconocido
Mobile apps
Desconocido
Ecommerce stores
Desconocido
Sectores recomendados
Entities registered in the Polish National Court Register
Cómo se llegó a la puntuación PetroHrys
Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
9 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
10 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
9 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
10 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.