List of Registered Telecommunications Providers

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission’s list of organisations registered to offer telecommunications services in Canada. Registration is mandatory before an organisation may offer service and is free; it is a registration rather than a licence, and carrying traffic internationally requires a separate BITS licence.

Visit List of Registered Telecommunications Providers (opens in a new tab)applications.crtc.gc.ca

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
84
Domain Rating
82Ahrefs snapshot, measured

Domain Rating est un instantané daté d’Ahrefs de l’autorité du domaine. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, trafic estimé and domaines référents, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Vérification

Statut de vérification
Vérifié
Source de vérification
Registre public
Dernière vérification
Prochaine vérification prévue
Relecteur éditorial
Petro Hrys

Informations sur le registre

Registry type
Regulated operator register
Scope
National
Public access
Not established The overall access position has not been established from an official source. It is recorded as unknown rather than assumed to be open.

Évaluation

Points forts

  • The registration duty is stated plainly by the Commission: an organisation must register before it can offer or provide customers with telecommunications services.
  • The stated scope is broad and explicit, covering local voice, Voice over IP, internet, long distance, wireless and payphone services.
  • Registration is free, so the list is not filtered by ability to pay a fee.
  • The Commission publishes a companion list of providers removed from the registration lists, with a reason, so a disappearance can be traced rather than merely noticed.

Limites

  • This is a REGISTRATION, not a licence. The Commission grants nothing on registering, and an entry is not an authorisation to carry traffic internationally — that requires a separate BITS licence.
  • The Commission states that the information "has been provided by external sources" and that it "is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency" of it, so an entry is a provider’s own submission rather than a verified fact.
  • Registration says nothing about technical quality, solvency, or compliance with obligations other than the duty to register, and it does not establish that a provider is currently offering service.
  • Absence does not establish that an organisation may not operate. Exemptions exist, and a provider removed from the list appears on the separate withdrawn-and-incomplete list rather than here.
  • The list is rendered by JavaScript and showed only a loading state to the client used for verification, so no entry, count or coverage was observed and none is asserted.

Conseils pour la soumission

Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.

Difficulté de soumission
Inconnu
Qualité habituelle de l’inscription
Élevée
Délai habituel d’approbation
Inconnu
Review process
Inconnu

Idéal pour

Non recommandé pour

Liste de préparation

No checklist recorded yet.

Erreurs fréquentes

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

Ce que cet annuaire accepte

Startups
Inconnu
SaaS products
Inconnu
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Inconnu
Freelancers
Inconnu
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Inconnu
Open-source projects
Inconnu
Non-profits
Inconnu
AI products
Inconnu
Mobile apps
Inconnu
Ecommerce stores
Inconnu

Secteurs recommandés

Comment la note PetroHrys a été obtenue

Editorial trust 15%
9 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
8 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
9 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
8 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
8 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

Aucune relation éditoriale enregistrée pour le moment.

Guides couvrant cet annuaire

Aucun guide ne couvre encore cet annuaire.

Positionnement