FCC Public Inspection Files

The Federal Communications Commission’s online public inspection file system for broadcast stations, cable systems, direct broadcast satellite providers and satellite radio licensees. It publishes the disclosures those entities are required to keep — political time, quarterly issues and programs lists, ownership data and pending applications — and it is a disclosure system, not a licence register.

Visit FCC Public Inspection Files (opens in a new tab)publicfiles.fcc.gov

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
88
Domain Rating
91Ahrefs snapshot, measured

Domain Rating est un instantané daté d’Ahrefs de l’autorité du domaine. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, trafic estimé and domaines référents, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Vérification

Statut de vérification
Vérifié
Source de vérification
Registre public
Dernière vérification
Prochaine vérification prévue
Relecteur éditorial
Petro Hrys

Informations sur le registre

Registry type
Public filing database
Scope
National
Public access
Partly open The site was served anonymously with no credential and exposes a public search control, so login is recorded as not required for reading. Its sign-in route is described for filers rather than readers. No search was executed and no file was opened, so result content, coverage, any fee and any rate limit were not observed and stay null. Note that the Commission’s main host and its wireless2 and apps subdomains refused automated clients at the time of verification, while this host did not.

Évaluation

Points forts

  • It covers a precisely stated population — licensed full-service radio and television broadcast stations, Class A television stations, cable television systems, direct broadcast satellite providers and satellite radio licensees.
  • The Commission states the purpose in its own words: to make information the public already has a right to more readily available.
  • It exposes categories a licence register never would, including political time sold or given away and quarterly lists of significant programming.
  • It was the only Commission host that served automated clients at the time of verification, which makes it unusually reachable among FCC systems.

Limites

  • It is a FILING and DISCLOSURE system, not a register of authorisations. Presence establishes that an entity has a public file obligation and has filed; it does not establish that any licence is current, valid or unrestricted.
  • Broadcasting is not general telecommunications. An entity here is a broadcaster, cable system, DBS or satellite radio licensee, and that says nothing about whether it is an authorised telecommunications carrier.
  • It does not overlap the Commission’s wireless licensing system or its carrier filer database, so a reader checking spectrum or carrier status must use those instead and will find nothing useful here.
  • Absence does not establish that an entity is unlicensed or non-compliant. Only the entity types the Commission lists carry a public file obligation, and everything else is simply out of scope.
  • No search was executed and no file was opened during verification, so result content, coverage and any limits were not observed and none is asserted.

Conseils pour la soumission

Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.

Difficulté de soumission
Inconnu
Qualité habituelle de l’inscription
Élevée
Délai habituel d’approbation
Inconnu
Review process
Inconnu

Idéal pour

Non recommandé pour

Liste de préparation

No checklist recorded yet.

Erreurs fréquentes

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

Ce que cet annuaire accepte

Startups
Inconnu
SaaS products
Inconnu
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Inconnu
Freelancers
Inconnu
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Inconnu
Open-source projects
Inconnu
Non-profits
Inconnu
AI products
Inconnu
Mobile apps
Inconnu
Ecommerce stores
Inconnu

Secteurs recommandés

Comment la note PetroHrys a été obtenue

Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
9 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
10 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

Guides couvrant cet annuaire

Aucun guide ne couvre encore cet annuaire.

Positionnement