The Czech Bar Association publishes the search over its register of advocates and trainee advocates. Entry in the register is required to practise as an advocate in Czechia, so the search verifies a reserved professional status rather than membership of a voluntary body.
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
Partly open The search was served anonymously with no credential, so login is recorded as not required. No query was executed, so result content and any limits were not observed and stay null.
Official name
Vyhledávání advokátů a koncipientů
English title
Editorial translation
Assessment
Strengths
Entry is required to practise as an advocate, so the register is a genuine gate rather than a directory of willing participants.
It covers trainee advocates as well as advocates, so a client can tell which status a person actually holds.
It is the chamber’s own search over its own register, which makes it the authoritative Czech source rather than a commercial copy.
Limitations
It mixes populations with different rights — advocates, trainees, and providers operating under foreign law — so a hit alone does not tell a reader what a person may do.
The chamber notes that services provided under the law of a foreign state are not covered by the collective professional indemnity arrangement, so insurance cover is not uniform across entries.
No search was executed during verification, so result content and any limits were not observed and none is asserted.
An entry records that a person is entered in the register. It does not establish the outcome of any matter, the scope of any indemnity cover, or that an advocate is suitable for a particular case.
Submission guidance
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown
Best for
Checking whether a person is entered as an advocate in Czechia and may therefore provide legal services as one.
Distinguishing a qualified advocate from a trainee advocate, who appears in the same search but holds a different status.
Not recommended for
Assuming every entry carries the same rights. Advocates and trainee advocates are different statuses, and foreign legal service providers appear on different terms.
Treating entry as a statement about the quality of an advocate’s work or the outcome of any matter.
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Unknown
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
Advocates and trainee advocates in Czechia
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
9 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
5 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
8 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.