Register of Undertakings in Electronic Communications

The Czech register of undertakings in electronic communications, kept by the Czech Telecommunication Office. Entry follows a notification under section 13 of the Electronic Communications Act under the general authorisation regime — it is not a licence — and the register deliberately retains undertakings whose activity has ended.

Visit Register of Undertakings in Electronic Communications (opens in a new tab)ctu.gov.cz

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
90
Domain Rating
Not measured

Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Verification

Verification status
Verified
Verification source
Government register
Last verified
Next verification due
Editorial reviewer
Petro Hrys

Registry information

Registry type
Regulated operator register
Scope
National
Public access
Partly open Result rows were rendered to an anonymous client with no credential and no payment, and the database reported 2,845 records at the time of verification. Free public reading is therefore observed rather than inferred. Filters offered for business name, company number, municipality, street, network type, service type, certificate number and whether communication activity is currently interrupted or terminated. No filtered query was submitted, so behaviour under a specific search and any rate limit were not observed and stay null.
Official name
Evidence podnikatelů v elektronických komunikacích
English title
Editorial translation
Hosting
This registry is a distinct system hosted on the shared ctu.gov.cz platform.

Assessment

Strengths

  • It records what was actually notified, listing network types from metallic and optical lines to satellite and 2G-to-5G mobile, and service types from fixed and mobile voice to M2M and internet access.
  • It states its statutory basis directly: notification under section 13 of the Electronic Communications Act.
  • Results are readable without an account or payment, and the database carries its own update date.
  • It offers an explicit filter for undertakings that have not interrupted or ended their activity, so a reader can separate current from historical entries.

Limitations

  • Entry follows a NOTIFICATION, not a licence. Under the general authorisation regime the regulator grants nothing; the undertaking declares, and the register records that declaration.
  • The register lists undertakings that "were or are" authorised. An entry alone does not establish that a provider is trading today, which is why the interrupted-or-ended filter exists and why using it matters.
  • Number-independent interpersonal communications services — email and messenger services — are expressly excluded, so absence does not establish that a communications service is unlawful or unregistered.
  • Being recorded here proves nothing about spectrum or numbering. Notification as an operator, an individual spectrum authorisation and an allocation of numbers are three separate legal acts kept in three separate systems. A Czech undertaking’s spectrum and numbers are in the regulator’s two other databases.
  • Records from before 1 January 2022 sit in a separate predecessor database, so a full history may require following the link the regulator provides on each affected entry.

Submission guidance

Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.

Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown

Best for

Not recommended for

Preparation checklist

No checklist recorded yet.

Common mistakes

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

What this directory accepts

Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown

Recommended industries

How the PetroHrys Score was reached

Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
9 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
10 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
10 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

Guides covering this directory

Where this sits