The Czech register of postal service operators, kept by the same regulator that supervises electronic communications. It is included here because the Czech Telecommunication Office officially combines telecommunications and postal supervision, and it records which specific postal services each operator is entitled to provide.
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
Partly open The database was served anonymously with no credential, offering filters for operator, date the business entitlement arose, street, municipality, company number, certificate number, whether to include operators that have ceased activity, and the specific postal services provided. Login is therefore recorded as not required. No query was executed, so result content and any limits were not observed and stay null.
Official name
Evidence provozovatelů poskytujících nebo zajišťujících poštovní služby
English title
Editorial translation
Hosting
This registry is a distinct system hosted on the shared ctu.gov.cz platform.
Assessment
Strengths
It breaks entitlement down by service category — standard, registered, items for blind persons, printed matter and addressed advertising, each split into domestic, outbound and inbound.
It exposes the date on which the business entitlement arose, so a reader can see how long an operator has held it.
It is kept by the same authority that supervises electronic communications, so postal and telecom supervision are traceable to one regulator.
Limitations
It is a postal register. It says nothing about whether the operator is an electronic communications undertaking, holds spectrum, or holds numbers.
The database can include operators whose activity has ceased, so a hit alone does not establish that a company is currently providing postal services.
Operators recorded before 1 January 2024 sit in a separate predecessor database, and the regulator provides a link to it rather than merging the two.
Absence does not establish that a company carries nothing. The register records entitlement for the postal services the Act defines, and operators recorded before 1 January 2024 sit in the predecessor database rather than here.
No query was executed during verification, so result content and any limits were not observed and none is asserted.
Submission guidance
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown
Best for
Checking whether a company is entitled to provide postal services in Czechia.
Establishing which specific postal services an operator provides, down to domestic, outbound and inbound categories.
Not recommended for
Assuming a postal operator is also an electronic communications undertaking. The two registers are separate and entry in one says nothing about the other.
Assuming every entry is currently trading. The database offers an option to include operators that have ceased activity.
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Unknown
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
logistics
postal-services
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
7 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.