Swift Package Index
Open-source index of Swift packages that support Swift Package Manager, where a package enters the index by being submitted to the project’s public package-list repository and meeting a published set of technical requirements.
Visit Swift Package Index (opens in a new tab)swiftpackageindex.com
- Verified
- Free to submit
- No verification required
- Registration requirement unknown
- No review system
PetroHrys Score
- PetroHrys Score
- 67
- Domain Rating
- Not measured
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
Verification
- Verification status
- Verified
- Verification source
- Official documentation
- Last verified
- Next verification due
- Editorial reviewer
- Petro Hrys
Assessment
Strengths
- Inclusion requirements are published in full before submission
- The server is open source under Apache-2.0
Limitations
- No quality threshold is applied to packages that meet the technical requirements
- Scope is limited to the Swift ecosystem
Submission guidance
Official submission page (opens in a new tab)
- Submission difficulty
- Easy
- Typical listing quality
- Unknown
- Typical approval time
- Unknown
- Review process
- Unknown
Best for
- Publishing a Swift package so Swift developers can discover it
Not recommended for
- Projects outside the Swift ecosystem
- Companies looking for a business listing
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
- Startups
- Unknown
- SaaS products
- Unknown
- Enterprises
- Unknown
- Agencies
- Unknown
- Freelancers
- Unknown
- Local businesses
- Unknown
- Developer tools
- Yes
- Open-source projects
- Yes
- Non-profits
- Unknown
- AI products
- Unknown
- Mobile apps
- Unknown
- Ecommerce stores
- Unknown
Recommended industries
- Apple platform development
- Swift open-source libraries
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
- Editorial trust 15%
- 7 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
- Business usefulness 15%
- 6 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
- Verification quality 12%
- 5 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
- Platform reputation 10%
- 8 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
- Spam resistance 10%
- 6 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
- Industry importance 10%
- 7 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
- Long-term stability 10%
- 6 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
- Submission quality 8%
- 9 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
- Transparency 5%
- 9 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
- Moderation quality 5%
- 6 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.
Related directories
Similar directories
Guides covering this directory
No guide covers this directory yet.