Firmy.net

A Polish business directory operated by NNV Sp. z o.o. since 2007. A company presentation is created free of charge after registering an account, and the operator states that entries are also distributed to partner portals — which is useful to know before submitting.

Visit Firmy.net (opens in a new tab)firmy.net

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
52
Domain Rating
Not measured

Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Verification

Verification status
Verified
Verification source
Official documentation
Last verified
Next verification due
Editorial reviewer
Petro Hrys

Listing

Listing action
Create a listing

Registry information

Scope
National

Assessment

Strengths

  • Creating a presentation is free and the operator says so twice over: “Rozpocznij darmową reklamę Twojej firmy!” and “Zarejestruj się i promuj firmę bezpłatnie”.
  • The operator is identified in both the footer and the signup form’s data-protection notice: “Administratorem danych osobowych jest NNV Sp. z o.o.”
  • The operating history is long and stated on the site, running from 2007.
  • The submission is a genuine self-service route with its own page, not an enquiry form.

Limitations

  • Your entry does not stay on this site alone. The operator states a presentation reaches customers “z Google, aplikacji mobilnych oraz kilkunastu portali partnerskich” — from Google, mobile apps and more than a dozen partner portals. Where those entries appear is not enumerated.
  • The signup page claims a presentation “natychmiast po utworzeniu osiąga wysokie pozycje w wynikach wyszukiwania” — that it immediately reaches high positions in search results. That is the operator’s marketing claim and is NOT adopted here; no ranking outcome is asserted.
  • An account with a confirmed email address is required before a presentation exists, so this is not an anonymous submission.
  • Creating a presentation is documented; claiming an existing third-party entry is not, so no claim flow is asserted.
  • Whether verification is required, and by what method, is not documented, so nothing about verification is asserted.
  • No review system or owner-response function is documented, so neither is asserted.
  • No Domain Rating is published for this platform. No valid measurement exists in the frozen historical set and none may be estimated, so the metric is recorded as not measured rather than guessed.
  • A listing is a directory entry. It is not evidence that a business is solvent, currently trading, licensed, or checked beyond what the operator documents here.
  • No ranking, indexing, traffic or lead outcome is asserted. The operator markets outcomes; this record does not adopt them.

Submission guidance

Official submission page (opens in a new tab)

Submission difficulty
Easy
Typical listing quality
Unknown
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown

Best for

Not recommended for

Preparation checklist

No checklist recorded yet.

Common mistakes

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

What this directory accepts

Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown

Recommended industries

How the PetroHrys Score was reached

Editorial trust 15%
5 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
6 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
3 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
5 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
4 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
5 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
7 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
7 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
6 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
4 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

Similar directories

Guides covering this directory

No guide covers this directory yet.

Where this sits