The Polish register of statutory auditors, kept by the National Council of Statutory Auditors. It records individual auditors entitled to carry out statutory audits; audit firms are kept on a separate list by the same chamber.
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
Partly open Result rows were rendered to an anonymous client with no credential and no payment, showing register number and name, and the page reported 4,811 entries at the time of verification. Free public reading is therefore observed rather than inferred. Search fields offered for surname or number and for an associated audit firm. No filtered query was submitted, so behaviour under a specific search and any rate limit were not observed and stay null.
Official name
Rejestr biegłych rewidentów
English title
Editorial translation
Assessment
Strengths
The register states its own keeper on the page: it is kept by the National Council of Statutory Auditors.
Results are readable without an account or payment, with the register number shown beside each name.
It can be searched by an associated audit firm as well as by name, which links a person to the practice they work in.
Limitations
Entry is required to carry out statutory audits, so this is a licence register — but it says nothing about the quality of any audit.
It records individual auditors only. Audit firms are kept on a separate list by the same chamber, so absence here does not establish that a firm may not audit.
The chamber keeps the register and admits its members; that is not the same as supervising an individual engagement.
The published entry point carries a query parameter that selects the auditors view, so a link stripped of it may not land on this register.
Submission guidance
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown
Best for
Checking that a named person is entered in the Polish register of statutory auditors.
Establishing which audit firm an auditor is associated with.
Not recommended for
Checking an audit firm. Firms are kept on a separate list and do not appear in this register.
Judging audit quality. The register records entitlement, not how any engagement was performed.
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Unknown
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
accounting
professional-services
financial-services
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
9 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
8 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.