Federal award registration record operated by GSA, holding the registrations organisations must complete to bid for federal contracts or receive federal assistance, including the Unique Entity ID and the Responsibility/Qualification records formerly published as FAPIIS.
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
U.S. General Services Administration, Integrated Award Environment Government agency
Registry types
Procurement supplier registerCorporate number database
Scope
National
Public access
Partly open Public entity data is free to search. GSA states that sensitive and for-official-use-only entity data requires federal CAC or PIV sign-in, so part of the record is not public.
This registry is a distinct system hosted on the shared sam.gov platform.
Assessment
Strengths
The controlling record for federal award eligibility, including the UEI
Absorbs the former FAPIIS responsibility and qualification records in one place
Limitations
Entity data is self-reported and revalidated only at annual renewal, so it goes stale
Socio-economic self-certifications here are not SBA-adjudicated certifications
Submission guidance
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown
Best for
Checking whether an organisation is registered to receive federal awards
Resolving a Unique Entity ID before searching award data
Not recommended for
Confirming incorporation, which happens at state level
Establishing ownership, share capital or financial position
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Yes
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Unknown
Local businesses
Unknown
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Yes
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
Federal contractors
Grant applicants
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
8 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
9 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
6 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
9 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
10 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
8 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
6 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.