General Authorisation Database (GADB)

The Union database of notifications from providers of electronic communications networks and services, established by BEREC under the European Electronic Communications Code. It aggregates the notifications made to national regulators under the general authorisation regime; it does not replace them and it is not a licence register.

Visit General Authorisation Database (GADB) (opens in a new tab)gadb.berec.europa.eu

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
87
Domain Rating
96Ahrefs snapshot, measured

Domain Rating ist eine datierte Ahrefs-Momentaufnahme der Domain-Autorität. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, geschätzter traffic and verweisende domains, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Prüfung

Prüfstatus
Geprüft
Prüfquelle
Amtliches Register
Zuletzt geprüft
Nächste Prüfung fällig
Redaktionelle Prüfung durch
Petro Hrys

Registerinformationen

Registry types
Regulated operator register Cross-border registry interface
Scope
Supranational
Public access
Partly open The database was served anonymously with no credential, so login is recorded as not required. It is a JavaScript application that did not render its search to a non-executing client, so result content, coverage and any limits were not observed and stay null.

Einschätzung

Stärken

  • Its legal basis is stated on the database itself: Article 12 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Article 4(1)(l)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1971.
  • It is the only single interface covering notified providers across EU member states, which no national register can offer.
  • It can be searched by provider name, legal status, address and country, and by network type, service type, wholesale or retail level, public availability and geographical area.

Einschränkungen

  • It is a database of NOTIFICATIONS, not of licences. Under the general authorisation regime a provider notifies the regulator; no individual licence is granted, and an entry must not be read as one.
  • It aggregates what national regulators transmit. The national register remains the legal source of record, and a discrepancy is resolved there rather than here.
  • Being recorded here proves nothing about spectrum or numbering. Notification as an operator, an individual spectrum authorisation and an allocation of numbers are three separate legal acts kept in three separate systems. This database covers only the operator notification.
  • Providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services — email and messaging — are outside the notification duty in several member states, so absence does not establish that a service is unlawful or unregulated.
  • The interface is a JavaScript application, so it could not be exercised and nothing about result content or coverage is asserted.

Hinweise zur Einreichung

Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.

Schwierigkeit der Einreichung
Unbekannt
Typische Eintragsqualität
Hoch
Typische Freigabedauer
Unbekannt
Review process
Unbekannt

Am besten für

Nicht empfohlen für

Vorbereitungs-Checkliste

No checklist recorded yet.

Häufige Fehler

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

Was dieses Verzeichnis akzeptiert

Startups
Unbekannt
SaaS products
Unbekannt
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unbekannt
Freelancers
Unbekannt
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unbekannt
Open-source projects
Unbekannt
Non-profits
Unbekannt
AI products
Unbekannt
Mobile apps
Unbekannt
Ecommerce stores
Unbekannt

Empfohlene Branchen

Wie der PetroHrys Score zustande kam

Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
9 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
9 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
8 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
8 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

Noch keine redaktionellen Beziehungen erfasst.

Leitfäden zu diesem Verzeichnis

Noch kein Leitfaden deckt dieses Verzeichnis ab.

Einordnung