General Authorisation Database (GADB)

The Union database of notifications from providers of electronic communications networks and services, established by BEREC under the European Electronic Communications Code. It aggregates the notifications made to national regulators under the general authorisation regime; it does not replace them and it is not a licence register.

Visit General Authorisation Database (GADB) (opens in a new tab)gadb.berec.europa.eu

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
87
Domain Rating
Not measured

Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Verification

Verification status
Verified
Verification source
Government register
Last verified
Next verification due
Editorial reviewer
Petro Hrys

Registry information

Registry types
Regulated operator register Cross-border registry interface
Scope
Supranational
Public access
Partly open The database was served anonymously with no credential, so login is recorded as not required. It is a JavaScript application that did not render its search to a non-executing client, so result content, coverage and any limits were not observed and stay null.

Assessment

Strengths

  • Its legal basis is stated on the database itself: Article 12 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Article 4(1)(l)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1971.
  • It is the only single interface covering notified providers across EU member states, which no national register can offer.
  • It can be searched by provider name, legal status, address and country, and by network type, service type, wholesale or retail level, public availability and geographical area.

Limitations

  • It is a database of NOTIFICATIONS, not of licences. Under the general authorisation regime a provider notifies the regulator; no individual licence is granted, and an entry must not be read as one.
  • It aggregates what national regulators transmit. The national register remains the legal source of record, and a discrepancy is resolved there rather than here.
  • Being recorded here proves nothing about spectrum or numbering. Notification as an operator, an individual spectrum authorisation and an allocation of numbers are three separate legal acts kept in three separate systems. This database covers only the operator notification.
  • Providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services — email and messaging — are outside the notification duty in several member states, so absence does not establish that a service is unlawful or unregulated.
  • The interface is a JavaScript application, so it could not be exercised and nothing about result content or coverage is asserted.

Submission guidance

Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.

Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown

Best for

Not recommended for

Preparation checklist

No checklist recorded yet.

Common mistakes

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

What this directory accepts

Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Unknown
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown

Recommended industries

How the PetroHrys Score was reached

Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
9 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
9 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
8 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
8 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

No editorial relationships recorded yet.

Guides covering this directory

No guide covers this directory yet.

Where this sits