QBCC Licensee Register is the state register operated by the Queensland Building and Construction Commission. It records holders of QBCC building and construction licences in Queensland — both individuals and companies, across contractor, builder, trade contractor, nominee supervisor and site supervisor licence classes. A licensee is looked up by name or by licence number — QBCC states "if you have a person's licence number or name, you can look them up in our [licensee register]".
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Government agency
Registry types
Professional licence registerExclusion and debarment register
Jurisdiction
Queensland AU-QLD
Scope
Subnational
Public access
Open The register opens publicly on the myQBCC portal with no sign-in step and no payment. A search is run against a licensee name or licence number and returns a dated licence search certificate.
QBCC Licensee Register can be searched free of charge and without an account, directly from the Queensland Building and Construction Commission.
The authoritative way to verify that a Queensland building or construction contractor is licensed, for what classes of work, and under what conditions, before contracting.
Statutorily mandated in its own right: QBCC Act 1991 s 99(1) — "A register of licensees (the licensee register) must be kept by the commission." The search output is headed "LICENCE SEARCH - COMPANY / Issued Pursuant to Section 99 of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991".
ASIC registers who is incorporated and who may trade under a business name, nationally.
Limitations
This is an occupational licensing register, not a company or business register. It does not incorporate, register or number companies — company registration in Australia is federal, through ASIC — and holding a QBCC licence says nothing about a company's registration status.
The search interface is a JavaScript (Salesforce Lightning) application, so the search form itself could not be exercised programmatically; the no-login, no-payment finding rests on the register page serving without any sign-in redirect and on a complete licence search certificate being served live and unauthenticated from the same host.
Directed lookup only — a name or licence number is needed. There is no public bulk download or browse-all listing of every licensee from this register.
The free tier returns index data; extracts, certificates and lodged documents are a separate paid product.
Submission guidance
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown
Best for
Confirming a Queensland registration or licence that federal records do not carry
Establishing status before deciding whether a paid extract is worth ordering
Not recommended for
Confirming company registration, which in Australia is federal and sits with ASIC
Treating an entry as evidence of solvency, competence or general trustworthiness
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Unknown
Local businesses
Unknown
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
Entities registered or licensed in Queensland
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
9 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
7 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
7 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
7 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
8 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
7 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.