The roll of the French Order of Architects, kept and continuously updated by the regional councils of the Order. Entry on the roll is required to use the title of architect and to carry out the design work reserved to the profession, and the roll distinguishes architects entitled to design work from those registered for other activities.
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
Partly open The roll search was served anonymously with no credential, with fields for name, company name or registration number, postcode, town and region of registration, so login is recorded as not required. No query was executed, so result content and any limits were not observed and stay null.
Official name
Le tableau des architectes
English title
Editorial translation
Assessment
Strengths
It is the roll of the Order itself, kept continuously up to date by the regional councils rather than compiled periodically.
It separates architects entitled to design, interior and exterior layout, urban planning and works supervision from architects registered for other activities such as teaching, journalism or expert work.
It covers companies as well as individuals, and distinguishes liberal, salaried, associate, public-servant and company modes of practice.
It reaches the overseas regions, including Guadeloupe, Guyane, Martinique and Réunion-Mayotte, not only metropolitan France.
Limitations
Entry is required both to use the title and to carry out reserved design work, so the two effects coincide here — but an entry is still not a statement about the quality of any project.
Architects registered for other activities are on the roll but are NOT entitled to design work and, as the roll states, are not insured for it. Reading any hit as a designer is an error.
The roll is maintained by the regional councils of the Order, so the national interface aggregates regional decisions and the Order directs doubtful cases back to the regional council.
Several adjacent lists exist beside the roll — holders of a récépissé, service providers, fee lists and a special list of architects’ holding companies — and a search of the roll does not cover them.
Absence from the roll does not establish that a person never practised, and it does not exhaust the Order’s lists. Entry can end, the adjacent lists are searched separately, and the Order directs doubtful cases to the regional council.
No search was executed during verification, so result content and any limits were not observed and none is asserted.
Submission guidance
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown
Best for
Checking that a named architect or architectural company is on the roll of the Order.
Establishing whether an architect is entitled to carry out design and project-supervision work.
Not recommended for
Choosing an architect for a project. A separate finder exists for that and is not this register.
Assuming every architect found is insured for design work. The roll states that some are not.
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Yes
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
architecture
construction
professional-services
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
9 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
8 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.