Canadian Trademarks Database is the federal trademark register published by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. It carries applied-for and registered Canadian trademarks together with certification marks, distinguishing guises, geographical indications and plant breeders’ rights denominations, searchable by mark, owner, application or registration number and international registration number.
Exigence d’immatriculation pour l’inscription inconnue
Aucun compte utilisateur requis pour la recherche
Pas de système d’avis
PetroHrys Score
PetroHrys Score
91
Domain Rating
93Ahrefs snapshot, measured
Domain Rating est un instantané daté d’Ahrefs de l’autorité du domaine. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating is measured by Ahrefs and read through their public Domain Rating API. Each value carries the date it was read and describes the whole domain that was measured, not the individual page it appears beside. Where several records are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated reading rather than each carrying a figure of its own. A record shown as not measured is a record nobody has a reading for, which is not the same as a record measured at zero. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, trafic estimé and domaines référents, so they are not published for any record.
Open The search form is served directly with no account, sign-in or landing barrier, with its search fields and the database’s own currency date visible on the page.
This registry is a distinct system hosted on the shared ised-isde.canada.ca platform.
Évaluation
Points forts
The Canadian Trademarks Database can be searched free of charge and without an account, directly from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
CIPO states the database "provides access to over 140 years of Canadian trademarks data" and that a searcher can "search and study more than 1.4 million Canadian trademarks".
Coverage includes "all active and inactive marks that were cancelled, expunged, abandoned or refused after 1979", so a lapsed mark stays traceable.
The database publishes its own currency on the search page, which read 2026-08-05 when this record was verified.
Limites
It records trademarks, not businesses. An entry establishes nothing about whether the owner is an incorporated or registered entity, and nothing about its legitimacy or standing.
Unregistered common-law trademark rights exist in Canada and appear nowhere in the database, so a clear search is not a clearance opinion.
CIPO publishes a disclaimer about relying on the database and advises that searching intellectual property is complex enough to warrant a registered agent.
The Domain Rating shown is a dated measurement of the shared departmental domain ised-isde.canada.ca, not of this database.
Conseils pour la soumission
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Difficulté de soumission
Inconnu
Qualité habituelle de l’inscription
Élevée
Délai habituel d’approbation
Inconnu
Review process
Inconnu
Idéal pour
Checking whether a brand name or logo is already applied for or registered as a Canadian trademark.
Establishing the owner of record, the filing date and the current CIPO status of a Canadian mark.
Non recommandé pour
Confirming that a company legally exists, which is a corporate-registry question and not a trademark one.
Clearing a mark on its own, because unregistered common-law rights arise in Canada and appear in no register.
Liste de préparation
No checklist recorded yet.
Erreurs fréquentes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
Ce que cet annuaire accepte
Startups
Yes
SaaS products
Yes
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Inconnu
Freelancers
Inconnu
Local businesses
Inconnu
Developer tools
Inconnu
Open-source projects
Inconnu
Non-profits
Yes
AI products
Inconnu
Mobile apps
Inconnu
Ecommerce stores
Yes
Secteurs recommandés
Owners and applicants of Canadian trademarks
Comment la note PetroHrys a été obtenue
Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
9 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
9 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
9 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
10 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
7 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
8 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.