Krajowy Rejestr Zadłużonych is the Polish register of debtors, kept by the Minister of Justice under the Act of 6 December 2018. It discloses restructuring and bankruptcy proceedings, proceedings on a ban from conducting business activity, enforcement discontinued as ineffective, and maintenance arrears older than three months.
Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.
Not established The overall access position has not been established from an official source. It is recorded as unknown rather than assumed to be open.
Official name
Krajowy Rejestr Zadłużonych
English title
Editorial translation
Assessment
Strengths
It is a single statutory register for insolvency, restructuring, ineffective enforcement and maintenance arrears, populations that are otherwise spread across separate court and enforcement files.
The Act designates it as the Polish insolvency register for the purposes of the European insolvency regulation, so it is the register other member states connect to.
The Ministry of Justice publishes its scope and legal basis on its own pages, so what the register does and does not disclose can be checked against the responsible authority rather than a commentary.
Limitations
The portal is behind bot protection that returned an Imperva interstitial to every request, so no search behaviour, fee or credential requirement could be observed and none is asserted here.
There is no open API alongside the portal, unlike the National Court Register, so the access position cannot be established indirectly either.
Entries describe proceedings and enforcement outcomes. They are not a credit assessment and do not establish that a debt is currently owed.
Submission guidance
Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.
Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown
Best for
Checking whether a Polish person or entity is subject to restructuring, bankruptcy or secondary insolvency proceedings.
Finding whether enforcement against a Polish debtor was discontinued because it would not recover more than the cost of enforcing.
Not recommended for
Confirming that a Polish company exists or reading its officers, which is the National Court Register rather than this register.
Treating an absence of entries as evidence of solvency. The register records proceedings that have been opened, not a financial assessment.
Preparation checklist
No checklist recorded yet.
Common mistakes
No common mistakes recorded yet.
Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.
What this directory accepts
Startups
Yes
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Unknown
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Yes
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown
Recommended industries
Parties to Polish insolvency, restructuring and enforcement proceedings
How the PetroHrys Score was reached
Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
7 / 10How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
5 / 10What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
8 / 10How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10How the directory maintains entries after publication.
The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party
authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number
on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.