Register of Electronic Communications Network and Service Operators

The Spanish register of operators of electronic communications networks and services, kept by the CNMC. Entry follows a prior notification under article 6.2 of the General Telecommunications Act; operators must also notify cessation and must confirm every three years that they intend to continue.

Visit Register of Electronic Communications Network and Service Operators (opens in a new tab)cnmc.es

PetroHrys Score

PetroHrys Score
88
Domain Rating
Not measured

Domain Rating is a dated Ahrefs snapshot of domain authority. PetroHrys Score is an independent editorial assessment of the directory’s practical business value. They are separate measurements and are never combined. Domain Rating values are dated historical Ahrefs snapshots. Domain Rating is a dated historical measurement of the shared domain, not an assessment of this individual registry page. New measurements are not collected because the Research Center does not depend on mandatory authenticated APIs. Where several registries are published on one measured domain they repeat that domain’s single dated snapshot rather than each carrying a figure of its own. Domain Rating is a third-party metric produced by their respective providers, not by PetroHrys.com. Each recorded value carries its provider and the date it was measured, and describes the domain that was measured rather than one page on it. No source has been consulted for authority score, estimated traffic and referring domains, so they are not published for any record.

Domain Rating by Ahrefs (opens in a new tab)

Verification

Verification status
Verified
Verification source
Government register
Last verified
Next verification due
Editorial reviewer
Petro Hrys

Registry information

Registry type
Regulated operator register
Scope
National
Public access
Partly open The register’s official page was served anonymously with no credential, so login is recorded as not required. Register transactions are directed to the commission’s electronic office, and no public search was exercised, so search behaviour, result content, coverage and any limits were not observed and stay null.
Official name
Registro de operadores
English title
Editorial translation
Hosting
This registry is a distinct system hosted on the shared cnmc.es platform.

Assessment

Strengths

  • Its statutory basis is stated on the register’s own page: article 6.2 of Law 11/2022 of 28 June, the General Telecommunications Act.
  • It states the continuing obligations plainly — notify changes, notify cessation, and confirm every three years an intention to continue.
  • It publishes the relevant resolutions on registration questions, so contested points of scope are traceable to a decision rather than to inference.

Limitations

  • Entry follows a PRIOR NOTIFICATION, not a licence. If a notification does not meet the requirements the commission issues a reasoned decision treating it as not made, within fifteen days.
  • Providers of number-independent interpersonal electronic communications services also notify, but expressly for statistical and census purposes — their entry carries a different legal effect from an operator’s.
  • Being recorded here proves nothing about spectrum or numbering. Notification as an operator, an individual spectrum authorisation and an allocation of numbers are three separate legal acts kept in three separate systems. Spanish numbering rights of use are granted under a separate article and recorded in a separate register.
  • Because continuation is confirmed only every three years and cessation depends on the operator notifying it, an entry does not establish that a company is trading today.
  • Absence does not establish that a provider is operating unlawfully. A provider may have notified another member state, or may fall outside the notification duty, and the Union database rather than this register is where cross-border activity becomes visible.
  • No public search was exercised during verification, so nothing about search behaviour, result content or coverage is asserted.

Submission guidance

Records are created through incorporation, registration, filing, or statutory processes.

Submission difficulty
Unknown
Typical listing quality
High
Typical approval time
Unknown
Review process
Unknown

Best for

Not recommended for

Preparation checklist

No checklist recorded yet.

Common mistakes

No common mistakes recorded yet.

Establishing required submission assets requires submitting a listing and observing the result. That has not been done for any directory in this dataset, so it is not published rather than estimated.

What this directory accepts

Startups
Unknown
SaaS products
Unknown
Enterprises
Yes
Agencies
Unknown
Freelancers
Unknown
Local businesses
Yes
Developer tools
Unknown
Open-source projects
Unknown
Non-profits
Unknown
AI products
Unknown
Mobile apps
Unknown
Ecommerce stores
Unknown

Recommended industries

How the PetroHrys Score was reached

Editorial trust 15%
10 / 10 How far the entries a directory publishes can be relied on as accurate.
Business usefulness 15%
8 / 10 How much practical use a listing there is to the business being listed.
Verification quality 12%
9 / 10 How thoroughly the directory establishes that an entry is genuine before publishing it.
Platform reputation 10%
9 / 10 How the platform is regarded in its field. Deliberately not a popularity, traffic or recognition measure.
Spam resistance 10%
10 / 10 How well the directory keeps low-quality and promotional entries out.
Industry importance 10%
8 / 10 How central the directory is to its sector, independently of how useful one listing is.
Long-term stability 10%
9 / 10 How likely the directory is to still exist, and to still carry the entry, years from now.
Submission quality 8%
6 / 10 What the submission process asks for and how workable it is for the business submitting.
Transparency 5%
9 / 10 How openly the directory states its rules, costs and criteria.
Moderation quality 5%
9 / 10 How the directory maintains entries after publication.

The PetroHrys Score is a first-party editorial assessment, not a third-party authority metric. It is the weighted sum of the ten factors above, divided by ten, so the number on this page is reproducible from the values shown. Each factor is scored from 0 to 10 by a human reviewer and weighted as shown. The definitions describe what was weighed, not a rubric: no threshold or formula maps a directory onto a value, and two reviewers could reach different numbers. The score is reproducible from the factors shown on every record, but it is an editorial judgement, not a measurement.

Guides covering this directory

No guide covers this directory yet.

Where this sits